Meta sued over AI-driven layoffs targeting workers on medical leave
Twenty-six current and former Meta employees filed a lawsuit in federal court in Oakland, claiming the company used AI tools, including an internal assistant and a productivity scoring system built on keystrokes and token usage, to help decide who lost their job in May's cut of roughly 8,000 workers. The plaintiffs say the scoring system structurally penalized anyone on medical, parental, or family leave, since their activity data would show up as reduced output through no fault of their own. (Fortune, Reuters via U.S. News)
This is one of the first major test cases for what happens when a company hands layoff decisions to an algorithm and gets it wrong. Meta says the claims are baseless and that people, not AI, made the calls. But the lawsuit argues Meta never ran the bias review that California and New York City now legally require before using automated tools in employment decisions. If a court agrees, it sets a precedent every large employer using AI for performance or headcount decisions will have to reckon with.
Watch for the preliminary ruling on whether Meta can proceed with the separations set to begin July 22. If a judge pauses them, expect a wave of copycat filings against other companies that leaned on AI for their own 2026 layoffs.
|